<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Create a PDF newspaper from a website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rhftech.com/blog/2009/07/create-a-pdf-newspaper-from-website/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rhftech.com/blog/2009/07/create-a-pdf-newspaper-from-website/</link>
	<description>Technology for non-geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:37:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keyvan</title>
		<link>http://rhftech.com/blog/2009/07/create-a-pdf-newspaper-from-website/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Keyvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rhftech.com/blog/index.php/2009/07/create-a-pdf-newspaper-from-website/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the review Richard! Really appreciate it.

Regarding the bookmarklets, I think I need to be a little clearer in explaining what these do and how they differ. :)

The first bookmarklet (feed to pdf) works with feeds only. For the most predictable result you should click it when you&#039;re actually viewing a feed in your browser. If you&#039;re viewing a webpage and not a feed when you click it, the tool will try to discover the feed URL automatically, if it can&#039;t it will fail to generate a PDF.

The second bookmarklet differs slightly. If you&#039;re viewing a feed it will try and retrieve the full-text content of feed items and include them in the final PDF. If you&#039;re viewing a webpage and not a feed, it will _not_ try to discover the feed URL like above, it will assume you want the contents of the page you&#039;re viewing to be turned into a PDF.

I&#039;m trying to think how I can simplify the tools so people don&#039;t get confused with the results.

Thanks again for the write-up! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review Richard! Really appreciate it.</p>
<p>Regarding the bookmarklets, I think I need to be a little clearer in explaining what these do and how they differ. <img src='http://rhftech.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The first bookmarklet (feed to pdf) works with feeds only. For the most predictable result you should click it when you&#8217;re actually viewing a feed in your browser. If you&#8217;re viewing a webpage and not a feed when you click it, the tool will try to discover the feed URL automatically, if it can&#8217;t it will fail to generate a PDF.</p>
<p>The second bookmarklet differs slightly. If you&#8217;re viewing a feed it will try and retrieve the full-text content of feed items and include them in the final PDF. If you&#8217;re viewing a webpage and not a feed, it will _not_ try to discover the feed URL like above, it will assume you want the contents of the page you&#8217;re viewing to be turned into a PDF.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m trying to think how I can simplify the tools so people don&#8217;t get confused with the results.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the write-up! <img src='http://rhftech.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.rhftech.com/blog/2009/07/create-a-pdf-newspaper-from-website/feed/ ) in 0.52920 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 12:13 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 1:13 pm UTC -->
