Go to RHFtech Home

 

Point of View

 

Home

About RHFtech

Overview
  Services
  Technology
  Help
  FAQs
  
Fun Stuff
  Help Desk Tips
  Blog
  Links
  

Contact Us



The Curse of a New Computer

2005-12-14

Let’s get the curse out of the way first: I curse Bill Gates so that when he dies and goes to hell he has to spend eternity installing Microsoft software.

My old computer died two weeks ago. It was a trusty, overbuilt, over-clocked DIY project that had its origins in 2000. I was always fiddling with it, adding new or additional hard drives, upgrading the optical drives, the mouse, the keyboard, adding new devices such as USB and Firewire boards, installing new software, updating software… It was never the same from month-to-month. I had devoted loads of time and effort to customizing and tweaking the machine. But the motherboard died, so I needed a new computer, immediately.

I quickly examined the internet using my lab machine to see what was locally available that would be an acceptable tradeoff of features and price. Best Buy offered an eMachines model that would do. I called them to make certain it was in stock and off I went. When I got there the salesman dissuaded me from buying the computer I wanted because if I bought a package, including that computer model, an LCD monitor and a cheap printer, the total price after rebates would be less than buying the machine alone. So that is what I did.

I do not care for LCD monitors so I gave the LCD monitor to my wife because she needed the desk space she would recover by replacing her old CRT.

As an aside, LCDs are still vastly inferior to CRTs when it comes to display. Yes, they do take up less space, and are more energy efficient, but as a display, the most basic function of the monitor, they still are a distant second to CRTs in response rate, quality of image and range of resolutions. CRTs may not be fashionable but they are the better monitors.

I had no immediate use for the printer so it sits in its box in the basement waiting for the day I do have a use for it or I throw it out. It seems wasteful to me, but the rebate for the printer equaled its cost. So why not?

Once I got the equipment home I began the tedious and lengthy process of setting up the new machine. It took me many hours over 5 days to get it to a reasonable level of doneness where it would be useable day-in and day-out. It took 72 reboots to get to this point. Yes, I kept count.

This was a terrible waste of time and effort. I blame Gates. He has cheated us all with his awful implementation of the Windows OS, including the need to activate. What I should have been able to do was install the old machine’s C-drive in the new machine. Then the machine should have accessed the internet to download whatever drivers it needed to accommodate the new machine’s hardware. This should have taken me about 30 minutes total, to swap C-drives, download and install drivers, and reboot, just once, to a fully functional, fully customized “old” machine. It should not have taken me most of the week.

I wonder when the last time Bill Gates set up a new computer, probably not in a decade or more.

 

Intellectual Property – DRM, DMCA, Patents and Copyright

2005-11-14

A recent Reuters’ headline Justice Dept. Proposes Tougher Copyright Laws grabbed my attention. My reading is that the Bush administration wants to give the MPAA, the RIAA and other “big-media” organizations even bigger sticks than they already have to go after consumers.

Over the last several years technology news services, bloggers and their readers have devoted a lot of attention to IP issues. One of my favorite stories of the past week is Sony BMG Music Entertainment’s troubles with their most recent music CD copy protection scheme. When a user puts the CD into their PC, Sony BMG Music Entertainment installs hidden software that limits ripping and copying the music on the CD to another CD, computer, or MP3 player like an iPod. This is one of the harshest attempts to enforce DRM (Digital Rights Management) that I know of. Many other writers have noted issues with Sony BMG Music Entertainment’s methodology, the lack of disclosure and the remedies they have offered to remove the offending copy protection software. It has been reported that some European countries are conducting criminal investigations into Sony BMG Music Entertainment’s use of this software since it looks and acts like a virus or Trojan horse. Several antivirus software companies have labeled Sony BMG Music Entertainment’s efforts as malware. And there is a reported discovery of a computer virus that utilizes the Sony BMG Music Entertainment hidden software to its advantage. Further complicating the story, some writers have suggested that any attempt to remove the offending software from the users’ computers is a violation of the DMCA (the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.) All in all, it’s been a debacle for the purchasers of the DRM’ed music CDs and a public relations nightmare for Sony BMG Music Entertainment and Sony.

The strange world of software patents has also been a major story in the technology world for the past several years. Many applicants are receiving patents for what appear to be obvious ideas, often based upon prior art in the public domain. A recent example of this is a company that claims to have a patent on XML, a public standard for transmitting hierarchical information, even though XML is derivative of SGML and HTML and pretty much everything about XML is obvious. Seems the Patent Office takes an application and if the correct fee is attached issues the patent, leaving IP attorneys to wrestle with the consequences. The attorneys are happy to litigate the matter since they are handsomely rewarded for their efforts. Of course the larger part of the population is screwed by this inept government performance.

The most amusing recent development in the IP world is the patent application for a story with a plot. It reads

Process of relaying a story having a unique plot

Abstract

A process of relaying a story having a timeline and a unique plot involving characters comprises: indicating a character's desire at a first time in the timeline for at least one of the following: a) to remain asleep or unconscious until a particular event occurs; and b) to forget or be substantially unable to recall substantially all events during the time period from the first time until a particular event occurs; indicating the character's substantial inability at a time after the occurrence of the particular event to recall substantially all events during the time period from the first time to the occurrence of the particular event; and indicating that during the time period the character was an active participant in a plurality of events.

I am hopeful that the applicant receives a valid, enforceable patent, which would really help those lawyers I mentioned above.

So where am I going with this? It has been said that information wants to be free. I agree. I believe we should change the IP laws in the United States but not in the direction that the media companies and the current administration want to go. We should scrap most of the IP laws and severely limit the length, both initial and renewal periods, for patents and copyrights. Society benefits even if Mickey Mouse, AKA Disney, doesn’t.

N.B. The foregoing is copyrighted.

 

Exploring

2005-10-24

We’re all swimming in information. We have too much information about too many things that we don’t need to know about. You can see the stats on how many times a professional baseball player sneezed last season or in his career. You can see his sneezes-at-bat percentage and you can find out his ratio of sneezes to rbis.

Okay, so there’s too much data for most things in our lives, but the opposite applies when it comes to Microsoft’s view of what a computer user should know about their computer’s file system. Microsoft thinks you shouldn’t see your hard drive’s directory structure, and maybe it’s okay if you see the files and folders in “my documents”. They also think you shouldn’t see much information about a file, just its name attached to a super-sized icon that represents the type of file it is. And you only get to see this if you choose “File Open” from an application’s menu.

Once upon a time Windows Explorer was prominently featured as a way to navigate the directory structure of a computer. As time progressed and Windows version numbers evolved, Windows Explorer became less and less prominent until in the current Windows XP the wise marketers at Microsoft hide it under the “Start, Programs, Accessories” menu.

When I help a client find a file, and yes, people lose their files on their computers all the time, I first walk them through finding the trusty Windows Explorer application. The default settings for Windows Explorer hide the file extensions and system files, thereby complicating matters. So we need to change Explorer’s settings to show those things that should be shown by default. Then we need to change Explorer’s view to the details view from large icons view. Now the user can be smart about files rather than left in the dark. Now we’re ready to work some file magic.

Some knowledgeable users may ask why I use Explorer in all its glory rather than the search function from the start menu. It is because I do not like animated dogs on my computer. It is troubling to me that Microsoft thinks we are children who need eye-candy to use their software. Some of you may wonder why I want to expose the system files to the user and risk damaging the operating system. Well I think it’s important for a user to have an understanding of the organization of their computer’s directory structures so that when file problems arise they have a chance at successfully and efficiently dealing with them. Microsoft disagrees with me.

Most people are pretty smart, but they lose confidence when they are seated at their computers. In my experience people are more cautious in using their computers than they are behind the wheel of their cars where they could kill someone, even themselves. This doesn’t seem rational to me. I don’t think I can change driving habits, but I can influence computer habits. So I want to build confidence by informing them about their data, what it’s named and where it’s located.

If a user shows signs of proficiency, I’ll even recommend a Windows Explorer replacement application like xplorer² Pro that ramps up the user’s power to manipulate their files and directory structure to an expert’s level. But even if you stick with Windows Explorer, you’ll be much better able to cope with file-mania than without it.

So go out and find Explorer. Play with it. Change its settings to show file extensions and systems folders. Put the full directory listing in the address bar. Explore the Byzantine directory structure that is Windows. Look in the “Document and Settings” directory. Spend a few minutes looking through the “Program Files” folders to see what applications are installed on your computer. You may be surprised at how many folders and files reside on the average Windows computer. The number on your machine can easily exceed 100,000.

If you want to see a really easy navigation system I recommend checking out Google’s Gmail. It‘s easy to search and find items, which you would expect from Google, and it is a snap to organize, unlike Microsoft’s approach. It is too bad Google doesn’t make operating systems.

 

 

Home - About RHFtech - Privacy PolicyEmail Us
Copyright © 2005 Financial Alliance, LLC. All rights reserved.

 

1